Eircom has been forced to implement “3 strikes and you’re out”, according to Adrian Weckler:
If the music labels come to it with IP addresses that they have identified as illegal file-sharers, Eircom will, in its own words:
“1) inform its broadband subscribers that the subscribers IP address has been detected infringing copyright and
“2) warn the subscriber that unless the infringement ceases the subscriber will be disconnected and
“3) in default of compliance by the subscriber with the warning it will disconnect the subscriber.”
My thoughts — it’s technically better than installing Audible Magic appliances to filter all outbound and inbound traffic, at least.
However, there’s no indication of the degree to which Eircom will verify the “proof” provided by the music labels, or that there’s any penalty for the labels when they accuse your laser printer of filesharing. I foresee a lot of false positives.
DtecNet […] stems from the anti-piracy lobby group Antipiratgruppen, which represents the music and movie industry in Denmark. There are more direct ties to the music industry though. Kristian Lakkegaard, one of DtecNet’s employees, used to work for the RIAA’s global partner, IFPI. […]
Just like most (if not all) anti-piracy outfits, they simply work from a list of titles their client wishes to protect and then hunts through known file-sharing networks to find them, in order to track the IP addresses of alleged infringers.
Their software appears as a normal client in, for example, BitTorrent swarms, while collecting IP addresses, file names and the unique hash values associated with the files. All this information is filtered in order to present the allegations to the appropriate ISP, in order that they can send off a letter admonishing their own customer, in line with their commitments under the MoU.
[…] it will be a big surprise if [Dtecnet’s evidence is] of a greater ‘quality’ than the data provided by MediaSentry.
More coverage of the issues raised by the RIAA’s international lobbying for the 3-strikes penalty: