Links for 2008-09-18

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments (2)

Links for 2008-08-13

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments (1)

Spambots stealing GMail and Hotmail passwords?

I just received this mail from a friend:

Dear friend

Welcome to stwoxy.com ! We are one of the largest electronic distributors and wholesalers in Beijing China. We offer qualified digital products: Motorcycles?TVs, Notebooks, phones. PSP, projectors, GPS, DVD, DV, DC, MP3/4 and so on, which are of world famous brands, such as Sony, IBM, PHILIPS, NOKIA, DELL and so on. All our items are brand new from the manufactures and they come with 1-3 years’ after service. These days we are expanding our overseas market, and every item is sold in extremely low price. Such chances should never be missed, ladies and gentlemen, do come to stwoxy.com! you will surely have a big surprise! We are looking forward to hearing from you!

It was sent from a HTTP connection into GMail, and was delivered from there using valid DKIM, Domain Keys and SPF signatures. In addition, it was sent to all the addresses in his address book. In other words, this was no run-of-the-mill impersonation spam — for this one, the spammer obtained my friend’s username and password somehow, logged into GMail, scraped the address book, and then sent spam via GMail that way.

My friend says he didn’t access GMail using a desktop mail client, but did have his Google password saved in his web browser (a pretty typical configuration). My theory is that some virus/malware has infected his desktop machine, captured the saved-passwords file from the web browser configuration, and used that to log into GMail. Alternatively, it could also be a guessable username and password which was picked up via dictionary attack, I guess…

This is the first case I’ve heard of where spammers are actively stealing user account authentication tokens, in order to take over the accounts for spamming. (We’d long predicted it, of course, since it’s a natural response to “pay for mail” schemes… but since there’s no widely-used pay-for-mail system available yet, it’s premature!)

It seems this is not just a GMail thing, btw. Here’s a report of the same thing happening to some French guy via HotMail last month (or in english). I don’t speak Dutch, but this forum post looks like it might be the same situation.

If you’re curious, here’s a copy of the spam, delivered to a Yahoo! group; it appears these spammers aren’t too sophisticated in terms of the text they’re sending, since they haven’t morphed that text, HTML, or even the domain in the link yet. It’s just the malware that’s sophisticated, at this stage.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments (32)

Spammers “giving up” according to Google

According to this Wired story, Google reckons spammers are giving up on spam:

a remarkable trend is underfoot, according to Brad Taylor, a staff software engineer at Google: The number of spam attempts — that is, the number of junk messages sent out by spammers — is flat, and may even be declining for the first time in years.

Actually, this is a wilful misunderstanding of what the Googler in question really said, which was that ‘attempts to spam Gmail users have been leveling off over the last year and more recently, even declining slightly’. In other words, they didn’t make an observation about the state of the spam problem on an internet-wide basis — just about the “local” situation as it pertains to Gmail. Bad reporting there, Wired.

But, in passing…

David Berlind at ZDNet recently blogged a rather grumpy response to InfoWorld coverage of CEAS 2007. He raised a very important point:

If I could say something to the author of that story, it would be that so long as any anti-spam solution is not deployed universally throughout the Internet’s e-mail system (in other words, so long as some anti-spam tech is not a standard), that anti-spam solution actually makes the spam problem worse. You read that right. Worse. Proprietary anti-spam solutions make the global spam problem worse. They are digging us deeper into the hole that the Internet is already in because everyone who makes those solutions is under the false belief that “s/he who is finally successful at filtering out all spam while allowing the legitimate mail in wins.”

Google’s blog post is a case in point: ‘we’re keeping more spam out of your inbox than ever before, so more and more, you can use Gmail for things you enjoy without even realizing that the spam filter is there most of the time.’

That’s great — but it doesn’t help anyone except Gmail. It’s a myopic view of the spam problem, and David’s point stands.

(I disagree with his later conclusion that the only way forward is for Google, MS, AOL and Yahoo! to get together and ‘commit to jointly supporting the same technical solutions’ — when the usual BigCos get together, they tend to focus on their own priorities. Take what happened back in 2005 with nofollow for blog-spam — while it helped the search giants with their own overriding priority, which was to tweak their algorithms to filter out the spam on the search results page, it did nothing to slow the spam flood itself, which has continued unabated.)

We need more open-source, and open-data, anti-spam work.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments (9)

Long-lived spam via Yahoo! search

Back in May, I noticed some spam in my Moin Moin wiki, and fixed it.

As this Yahoo! Site Explorer view of taint.org demonstrates, Yahoo!’s search is still showing these results, partly; despite the spam content being long deleted (example ), they still show the spam title and URL, despite the fact that the title and text no longer contains those spam keywords.

Annoyingly, I’m still seeing referrer clickthroughs from search.yahoo.com to these deleted pages from lusers looking for porn, as a result. Come on Yahoo!, fix your search to notice the title change at least, so people don’t think the pages still contain porn!

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments (4)

a plug for Map24

Nat at O’Reilly Radar mentions that Multimap have added a public API . It’s great to see more sites adding public APIs, but sadly, as I note in a comment there, Multimap isn’t any use for me — they, along with Google and Yahoo!, have really crappy Irish mapping. Their geocoders (the part that turns an english-language address into a GIS coordinate pair) are pretty much non-functional for Ireland.

I moved from the US to Ireland earlier this year and found this pretty frustrating, after the joys of using the US mapping sites to get driving directions etc.

Thankfully, another contender has emerged recently — Map24.

They have a great geocoder for Ireland, and very reliable directions, which are even accurate for some of the more baroque one-way-system traffic-management changes that Dublin’s city planning department have come up with recently. The look and feel of the website is a little clunky in Firefox — not as smooth as Google’s — but it has some nice AJAXy touches now and seems to be heading in the right direction.

Interestingly, they now offer a public API for third-party mashups, and even offer an API for their geocoder — so someone preferring the Google look and feel could mash that up, using Map24 to find the coordinates and Google to display an area map! (Actually, I think that may be how John Handelaar’s earlier hack worked – I note in the comments that he mentions Map24 provide Lycos’ mapping backend. aha.)

Anyway — Map24 — if you’re looking for a good Irish mapping/driving-directions site, it’ll do the trick.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Flickr’s Lousy US-Only Maps

Update: This is now fixed. See here for details…

Here’s the 2lmc boys getting rightly annoyed about Flickr’s new mapping feature, which displays geotagged photos overlaid on a mapping UI — as they note, it’s basically a steaming pile of crap outside the US:

However, because Flickr are owned by Yahoo, they’re using their maps. And, like all Yahoo! products, if you’re not American, it sucks.

Compare this lovely data-rich map of SF:

sf

With this featureless grey blob:

dublin

That’s just pathetic — there isn’t a single place name visible, and even the Phoenix Park, the biggest urban park in Europe, is simply displayed just as a light-coloured splat with a road going through it.

It appears the Yahoo! mapping data for the UK and Ireland just isn’t really there. What someone needs to do, is take the geotagging data from Flickr, and overlay it on the far more informative Google map data instead ;):

dublin google

It’s a real shame — I used to rely on Y! Maps to get directions everywhere while in the US. They’re missing out on so many customers here…

Update: good news — the Flickr maps are now things of beauty to match Google’s:

flickr-fixed.gif

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments (11)

Yahoo! delete b3ta newsletter mailing list?

Today’s top item on the b3ta front page, under Site News:

Yahoo please talk to us! Help! - our yahoogroups list (with over 100,000 subscribers) has been deleted. We don’t know why. If you work at Yahoo and can help us sort this out please contact me at robmanuel AT gmail dot com.

posted by rob on 10th Feb at 2pm

B3ta is a long-established UK humour site who send out a weekly newsletter, every Friday afternoon, using Yahoo! Groups as their mailing list service. They’ve been doing this for years. Yep, that’s 100,000 subscribers.

Anyway, if anyone from Y!Groups, or anyone who knows someone there, is reading, please do get in touch with the b3ta guys — this is a very serious catastrophe for them. I’d be curious to hear how/why this happened.

To tie this into spam-filtering and email operational topics, it brought this posting from Jeremy Zawodny to mind:

This all makes me wonder if it’s worth it for smaller organizations to bother running their own mail servers anymore. If Google offered small business mail the way Yahoo does, there’d be some serious competition in the market and it’d make a lot of people’s lives much easier.

While Jeremy was talking about a different service from list hosting, I think we’re seeing the other side of the email-outsourcing coin, here.

Update: fwiw, it’s back:

Yahoo update - on Friday Yahoo deleted our list of 100,000 newsletter readers email addresses, hence we didn’t send a newsletter. Today they’ve been in touch and have promised a response by Tuesday. Fingers crossed. UPDATE: It looks like it’s back! Hooray for Yahoo!

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments (3)

Microsoft 0wnz ‘http’

Web: Back in 2002, it occurred to someone to check the Google search results for ‘http’, to figure out what the most popular sites were.

Looks like it’s changed — here’s the top five results from a Google search for ‘http’ now:

  • 1: Microsoft
  • 2: AltaVista (!!)
  • 3: Yahoo!
  • 4: My Excite
  • 5: Google

My guess: older links are getting good PageRank, using whatever new tweaked algorithm they’re using. But AltaVista beating Google? ;)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Yahoo! release DomainKeys

Spam: Yahoo!’s DomainKeys proposal for sender auth.

I’m in the UK this week, so commenting in detail isn’t too easy right now. But briefly, the big problem I foresee for DK is dealing with mailing lists and forwarders.

I did spot this oddity in the patent license, though:

Yahoo! will grant a royalty-free, worldwide, non-exclusive license under any Yahoo! patent claims that are essential to implement or use any Implementations so that licensees can make, use, sell, offer for sale, import, or yodel Implementations; provided that the licensee agrees not to assert against Yahoo!, or any other Yahoo! licensees of Implementations, any patent claims of licensee that are essential to implement or use any Implementations.

My emphasis. “Yodel”? ;)

But seriously — patents will make implementation of this tricky for open-source projects, unless those terms are extended to allow the license to be transferable and usable indefinitely.

Patents: argh. That’s all I can say for now. :(

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Photoshop Phriday - the perfect opportunity

Ben mails on this Yahoo! link: ‘U.S. Central Command released these digitally enhanced photographs of what former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein might look like’. As he notes, let’s face it, it’s crying out for the SomethingAwful Photoshop Phriday treatment. However, I’m too cheap to have an SA forum account. Anyone got one and care to suggest it?

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Most-mailed story ever?

this story has been mailed 120 times since it was posted on Yahoo! UK at 11:30 AM GMT yesterday. Which is it? Yep, it’s ‘masturbating may protect against prostate cancer’, premiered at New Scientist. Most mailed/blogged story ever, I’d guess!

For some reason I didn’t post this to the blog on Wednesday when it came out, instead posting it to another list. But talking about it with some mates last night, they noted this snippet:

The team speculates that infections caused by intercourse may increase the risk of prostate cancer. ‘Had we been able to remove ejaculations associated with sexual intercourse, there should have been an even stronger protective effect of other ejaculations,’ they suggest.

Interesting!

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Finns Scratch Heads Over N.Korea Porn Claim

Yahoo!: Finns Scratch Heads Over N.Korea Porn Claim:

HELSINKI (Reuters) - Finnish officials were at a loss to explain an allegation made on Thursday by a U.S. official that North Korea has been caught trying to sell pornography in the small Nordic country. ‘It sounds strange. It sounds wild,’ an official at the Foreign Ministry told Reuters.

U.S. Ambassador to Australia Tom Schieffer made the comments earlier on Thursday to the National Press Club in Canberra, saying North Korea was using a ‘mafia-like’ business model to make up a revenue shortfall when the Soviet Union collapsed in the early 1990s.

Found on MemeFirst, which looks like a pretty nifty site. Now to see if I can rig up RSS for it. One of the MemeFirst culprits seems to be Stefan Geens, who also has a blog; he reviews ‘How The Irish Saved Civilization’ in fine style, comparing the annotations of the medieval Hibernian monks to blogging. hmm…

He’s stuck in Dublin, right now, trying to figure out a way to get hold of some bandwidth. I wish him luck.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Senderbase and Alexa

SenderBase is a cool site which lists email traffic volumes for specific senders and organisations.

This will make for some very cool spam tests. As you can see, several of the top ten sending domains are ISPs that, shall we say, may have a few ‘issues’ with customers’ open proxies. They’re scattered in amongst the Yahoo!s and Hotmails ;) Then there’s a couple of well-known domains that, let’s say, have a habit of appearing on the SBL.

Well, not quite as practical, but useful nonetheless, is Alexa’s ‘traffic detail’ feature for the web.

Very nifty; a log-scale graph of traffic as measured by pageviews from Alexa’s toolbar, and you can pick 2 sites and compare their hitrates. For example, according to this, SpamAssassin is bigger than Jesus ;)

Thanks to ‘Mr. FoRK’ on the FoRK list for this URL…

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Spam filters and FTC’s ‘Do Not Call’ list

Wired News: Yahoo! Spam Filter Thwarts FTC:

Consumers who used Yahoo Mail e-mail accounts to register for the Federal Trade Commission’s new do-not-call service were met with an ironic twist Friday — Yahoo’s spam filter intercepted confirmation messages sent from FTC servers.

‘Our tests showed that Yahoo’s spam filter was automatically sending the confirmation messages from the do-not-call list into users’ bulk-mail folders,’ said NetFrameworks co-founder and CTO Eric Greenberg. ‘The irony of it is that the spam filter is blocking the very thing that’s supposed to help you stop getting spam over the phone.’

FWIW, I signed up, without any hitches.

As noted elsewhere, their mail-sending systems were massively overloaded – an insane quantity of people were also signing up at the same time, from what I’ve heard.

But a day later, the confirmation message eventually came through, and got run through my ‘dogfood’ SpamAssassin 2.60 installation. That gave it -5.2 points. Not bad, considering they didn’t have reverse DNS records for the machines sending the mails out ;) (update: they do now, btw.)

In case you’re wondering, the tests it hit were: BAYES_00,CLICK_BELOW,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,NO_REAL_NAME. Pretty respectable, really. Aside: that message getting a BAYES_00 match is impressive, given that (a) that Bayes db was initialized entirely from auto-learned mails, no hand-training; and (b) I’d never received a mail from the Do Not Call registry operators before.

Tamales: this is cool — San Francisco’s boozy culture paid homage last night to ‘The Tamale Lady’:

Tonight, Zeitgeist will swell again for Ramos’ 50th birthday party. There, San Francisco filmmaker Cecil B. Feeder will premiere his mini-documentary ‘Our Lady of Tamale,’ featuring 30-second songs submitted by dozens of San Francisco musicians.

Isn’t that nice. Ben says it went well. Somehow or other we missed her tamales last time we were up, but I’ll be sure to get one next time…

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Dublin Guinness to brew the Nigerian version

Yahoo: Guinness brews up African recipe.

DUBLIN (Reuters) - Guinness is brewing up an African-style version of its famous stout to quench the thirst of Ireland’s growing immigrant population. Tests are under way to replicate Guinness manufactured in Nigeria at its St. James’ Gate headquarters in Dublin. The African version of Guinness Foreign Extra Stout tastes sweeter and heavier than the traditional draught popular in the west, and is almost double in strength.

A Guinness spokeswoman said the new brand was a result of consumer demand from Ireland’s growing African population. ‘This is the home of Guinness and so we’re seeing if we can brew the African recipe here and produce it at St. James’ Gate to the same recipe as in Nigeria,’ she said. …

Guinness Foreign Extra Stout was first exported from Ireland in the 19th century to British colonies. The first Guinness exports to Africa were to Sierra Leone in 1827. The stronger alcohol content helped preserve it during the long sea journey.

I can’t wait to try it out. I used to continually overhear conversations on the bus between Dublin locals and Africans regarding whose Guinness was best — time to settle the argument! ;)

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Network Solutions the weakest link, again

Yahoo: al-Jazeera website redirected:

The hacker was able to gain control of the domain name by asking domain seller Network Solutions for the account password on official al-Jazeera stationery, said an industry source speaking on condition of anonymity.

A spokesman for Network Solutions’ parent company declined to comment on how the hacker was able to hijack the domain name, but said the company had fixed the problem and was trying to track the impostor down.

‘We followed our procedures, in this particular instance someone was able to get around those procedures,’ said Brian O’Shaughnessy, a spokesman for Internet security firm VeriSign.

They fixed the problem? Surely this is exactly what happened with the sex.com domain several years ago?

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Auth cookies in SMTP

Jeremy describes a way to kill off ‘joe-jobs’ — the practice of forging somebody’s address on spam, generally used to get around ‘does this user exist’ spam-filters, also used to ‘punish’ folks the spammer doesn’t like. Anyway, JZ’s suggestion is this:

One of the ideas tossed about was to implement a system that would make it easy for any MTA (Mail Transfer Agent–the programs that deliver e-mail on the Internet) to verify that a message that claims to be from somebody@yahoo.com really is from a yahoo.com user.

This is technically doable. And it might be a good idea. Especially, as I argued, if one of the other big players (AOL or MSN/Hotmail) jumps on board and uses the same technique. If either one began to do the same, I expect that a domino effect would follow. Boom. Instant adoption.

But then he doesn’t say how to do this in a way that a spammer can’t forge. Dammit. ;)

Anyway, on with the message.

… However, one interesting objection was raised during the debate…

Wouldn’t that just cause spammers to prey on domains that are less equipped to ’swallow a few million bounces per hour without breaking a sweat’? (To paraphrase a co-worker.)

Yep, it would — until those domains also instituted similar systems. Anyway, those domains are victims now anyway; I would say only about 50% of my spam comes from forged Yahoo!, Hotmail or other domains — the rest uses domains of small ISPs, and the occasional joe-job.

But back to the system. I would guess what Jeremy’s talking about is pretty similar to the system Pedro Melo describes in the comments. It consists of 2 components:

  • a header added by the MTA at relay time — X-Originator-Signature.
    • This contains ‘an internal identifier for the person who sent it …, a timestamp, and a MD5 of those two fields and a third secret passphrase I keep.’
  • a CGI script on a web server, which validates a pasted X-Originator-Signature header against what hashing those values with the secret passphrase produces, and responds ‘yea’ or ‘nay’.

A nifty idea. Jeremy, was that what you were thinking?

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

minor bloglet

New Scientist: Turing tests filter spam email. “Simple tests designed to distinguish computers from humans are increasingly being used to clamp down on unsolicited, or ’spam’, email advertising.”

The article notes that Yahoo! has imposed such a test to block automated account-signup-then-spam bots. (Thankfully — that might discourage some of the more automated 419 spammers.)

Sorry ’bout the lack of blogging — very busy ’round here, what with a new SpamAssassin release in the pipeline and a move to the US in the offing…

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

EU DMCA fails - for now

Yahoo!: Deadline Passes for European Digital Copyright Law. ‘A deadline for adopting a new EU law on copyright protection has passed with just two member countries signing up, dealing a blow to media and software companies beset by unauthorized duplication of their works across the Internet.’ The two countries are Greece and Denmark, which is odd, considering I thought Ireland had do so too.

Other actors in the private sector, such as Internet service providers, have weighed in heavily on the issue, opposing laws that could ultimately hurt consumer rights.

Yay ISPs!

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

(Untitled)

Yahoo:

With a defiant cry of “right on motherfuckers”, pop superstar Madonna has presented one of the world’s most famous art prizes to conceptual artist Martin Creed for his controversial creation of a bare room with a light that switches on and off.

Riight. If there was ever any doubt, I reckon it’s now clear that the Turner Prize is all about getting column inches instead of actually awarding new, interesting art.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

(Untitled)

The Sun provides tolerant coverage of Islam? Never thought I’d see the day.

Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 12:13:27 +0100
From: “Tim Chapman” (spam-protected)
To: forteana (spam-protected)
Subject: Sun shocked into tolerance

On the press


Papers went for it and won


> >From the Sun leaders defending Islam to the Telegraph quoting Kipling the nationals made a good fist of their first drafts of history

Special report: Terrorism in the US

Peter Preston Sunday September 16, 2001 The Observer

There were, of course, all the predictable oddities, banalities, illogicalities and flat-out eccentricities. The Sun (oddly, maybe even eccentrically) cleared a double-page spread to tell its readers that: ‘Islam is not an evil religion… Blaming Islam for the horrors the world witnessed on Tuesday is like blaming Christianity for the hatred between Protestants and Catholics in Belfast. The Muslims in Britain ARE British.’ If that’s eccentricity, give us more of it by the bucketload. The Mail, within a single leader column, railed against British ‘appeasement’ of Sinn Fein/IRA while instructing George Bush that ‘it is surely the time for another effort at Middle East settlement’. … full analysis of UK media coverage at http://www.observer.co.uk/business/story/0,6903,552462,00.html and of US coverage at http://www.observer.co.uk/business/story/0,6903,552463,00.html

———————— Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ———————~–> FREE COLLEGE MONEY CLICK HERE to search 600,000 scholarships! http://us.click.yahoo.com/47cccB/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/7gSolB/TM ———————————————————————~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: (spam-protected)

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments